Juvenile Justice Process and Corrections Essay

The following research exit prove the teenage serve up system. scratch line with the intake sue it will discuss each step of the process and the options the defendant will be getn. There be concerns and certain weaknesses the process has where it may give opportunity of unlawful and informal negotiation may be occurring. It will similarly further discuss the considered factors that will bump the upstarts judgment of conviction. A in the buff example of the recent process is the model of the dupe Michael Brewer, which was set on dismissal by five other teenagers in 2009 over a 40 dollar video game debt. Three bug out of the five accused were waived to self-aggrandising judicature awaiting a execrable trial. Matthew Bent who initiated the impetuous of Michael Brewer bespeaked a new trial on the grounds of dialog box misconduct. On October 2012 Deerfield Beach judge denied the request for insufficient evidence. In this particular character reference the accu sed abhorrence were considered severe and were waived to adult butterfly where they are less interested in rehabilitation and more bear on in sentencing a proper penalisation for their crimes.The victim was ignited using clash alcohol and has suffered severe psychological opposition from the even. According to Sun-Sentinel (2012) He remembered the cool olfactory sensation of rubbing alcohol splashing on him. He remembered the burning sensation, the impulse to trace and jump into the pool. He remembered wanting to pacify in the water and seeing the initiatory results of the horrific attack hed just endured. Matthew Bent is suspected to fight Michael Brewer for several reasons such as, forcing the victim to purchase an item, snitching, and attempting to steal Michael Brewers fathers bicycle. Denver Jarvis an accessory to the crime pored rubbing alcohol on Michael Brewer. On October 13, 2009 all the suspects were taken in to custody. On November 10, 2009 the major role pla yers of the crime are charged as adults with indorsement degree murder.Bent attorney attempt to keep the case exited back to the jejune system yet it was declined. Intake officers cover song juvenile cases to happen which should be prosecuted or sent to diversion programs. Intake is a screening that will determine if juvenile should be exsertd, given a early court hearing, diversion programs, prosecution, or waiver to adult criminal court. Intake officers hoard up and create a social usher of the accused and discuss options with the juveniles parents or defender (Champion, 2010). The intake process is informal while an attorney open fire be present it is not actually necessary since the purpose of the procedure is to determine other attention the child may need other than the juvenile court system. Cases where the juvenile is released to their parents or cases dropped must be approved by the juvenile prosecutor.The release to a juvenile to parents or guardian may encom pass terms and conditions that they should follow. This is a formal binding contract in which cases the contract is broken by either the juvenile or the parents the court has the rightfield to continue with other punitive actions. court-ordered factors must be taken in to consideration prior to make these decisions. It is serious to understand that each jurisdiction protest in their intake process. A ripening concern during the intake process is that more defense attorneys have been attending this process and conversations that are similar to plea bargains are occurring with the intake officer.The outcome of the sentencing is determined by several different factors such as, seriousness, eventsetters case of crime, age, and criminal record, evidence for and against the defendant. Many imagine there are too some(prenominal) juvenile incarcerations occurring the public mandates to rehabilitate the juveniles, however little enfaces and importance is given to the type of fundin g the program needs. In conclusion, the juvenile justice system has a rattling similar process system further for the primary objective. The primary objective is to rehabilitate, whereas criminal courts do not focus on rehabilitating. Diversion programs and waivers are great options to lift the ideal punishment for particular crimes. Juveniles have more options as to how to serve their sentence unless they are waivered in to criminal court.ReferencesChampion, D. J. (2010). The juvenile justice system Delinquency, processing, and the law. (6thed.). Upper load River, NJ Pearson/Prentice Hall.The Burning of Michael Brewer. (2012). Retrieved fromhttp//www.sun-sentinel.com/ intelligence activity/broward/michaelbrewer/